From "Song of Myself"

“I celebrate myself, and sing myself,

"And what I assume you shall assume,

"For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you.”

I was thinking of this passage of "Song of Myself" recently in connection with a 1949 book, THE VITAL CENTER, by political historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr.

The second world war was a recent memory. The Cold War was a new and dangerous reality. Schlesinger, a Cold War liberal, presented Roosevelt-Truman liberalism, and democracy with a small "d" in general, as a vital center, between the horrors of Stalin on the one side and those of the fascists on the other. He saw the then-recent split in the Democratic Party as symbolic of this. The progressives under Henry Wallace left the Party in 1948 to run their own campaign. The segregationists under Thurmond left the same party for their very different reasons.

Schlesinger was rather hard on both of them, in praise of Truman. Indeed, Schlesinger is harder on the two dissident Dems than he is on Dewey, who barely figures in his account at all. For Schlesinger it was left, right, always amiably splitting up Poland, versus center. And the righteous side was the center, which was Truman.

What does any of this have to do with Whitman? Well: Schlesinger brings Whitman in. He sees Whitman as an enthusiast of democracy. He contrasts Whitman with Henry David Thoreau. Thoreau, with his individual isolationism in the woods, represents the sickly refusal of some men of letters to engage in politics, or even communal life, at all. Whitman represented passionate participation in both.

Schlesinger doesn't quote the above passage. But he might have. And it might be used both for and against the reading of Whitman in Schlesinger's book.

Comments

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave. First, Plato is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability. I only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere. At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak

Jamesian Philosophy Refreshed

Search This Blog