Skip to main content

Silicon Valley Bank, Part II

 


What was the significance, what is the current significance, of the failure of Silicon Valley Bank in March of this year? 

For a few nervous weeks thereafter, it appeared that this might be the spark that sets off the forest fire, the catalyst for a 2008 style banking crisis. But with four months between that moment and our own, we can say with some safety that that was NOT the case. 

One ripple, though, was this: the failure of SVB had a rather severe impact on the west coast venture-capital world which SVB and its parent company, SVB Financial Group, served. The bank and its parent and sister entities were founded precisely to serve that world. 

Yet the broader economy survived. I do believe that venture capitalists serve valuable economic functions. But they are not day-to-day functions, and the rest of the system can get along without them for a time. The VC spending in the United States fell by half in the second quarter of 2023, largely due to the absence of SVB. But the world goes on and the third quarter will surely see a lot of that restored. 

The fact that the parent company and some of the sisters went into bankruptcy court has created a new genre of gossip for specialty finance. What assets will the bankruptcy court auction off and who will win them? Intriguingly, the former Leerink Partners, which was purchased and renamed SVB Securities years ago, has now been spun out of the bankrupt estate and purchased by ... Jeffrey Leerink. The fellow smiling above. And he has restored to it the name Leerink Partners. The old is new again. 

Leerink's special interest was always the financing of biotech. We will see if it ends up back there. 

Beyond those two points, and beyond the issue of whether the FDIC was too generous in its support of the depositors beyond the formal insurance limits, I think the significance of SVB is ... the dog did not bark in the nighttime. THAT is the curious incident. The US economy is not as fragile as many of us might have feared.

There is also the question of where Leerink got the money to pull off this comeback, and what is the big picture for those backers. But ... another day. Tomorrow we will discuss something completely different. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more