Skip to main content

Horace Greeley

 


My recent reading includes HORACE GREELEY, a biography of the famed editor-publisher of that name, written by James M. Lundberg of the University of Notre Dame. 

Much about Greeley I am just learning as I go along. 

Greeley was born in February 1811, in New Hampshire, though he did most of his growing up in Vermont. He went to New York City to seek his fortune in 1831. So it wasn't "go west young man" for him -- it was head south. Like a lot of young men from the provinces who have headed toward the nearest metropolis over millennia, he had a high opinion of himself and big plans to effectuate that opinion.

It took him a decade to find his footing and to create the vehicle with which he will be forever associated. Greeley created the New-York Tribune in 1841. (Yes, the hyphen was standard then). This was a vehicle for a reform-oriented Whiggery associated also with William Seward and Thurlow Weed in the context of New York state's politics and beyond it that of the nation.

Indeed, Greeley pioneered the idea that a  municipal paper could at the same time speak to the nation. This was the era when telegraph lines were connecting the east coast and the midwest. Telegraph wires trailed the westward moving frontier, but didn't trail it by much. Greeley created a weekly edition of the Tribune, an abridgement of each week's full municipal edition. that is what was distributed in the Midwest and what made him a totemic figure there. 

And beyond, apparently, Heck, Mark Twain got tired of hearing about him. Twain writes in a memoir that when he was "roughin' it" in the west he kept hearing the same story about a westward tour that Greeley had taken before him. Greeley was in a stagecoach travelling rough roads and his head ended up crashing through the roof of his carriage. His frontier admirers loved telling this story to each other, it appears. Twain had had too much of it and when someone started talking about Greeley and the stagecoach, Twain would stop him and demand to be told about Washington and the cherry tree instead. 

That will get us started. I'm sure I'll have more to say about Greeley in the near future. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers