Skip to main content

Renaissance Timeline




 Moments worth keeping in mind in coming to grips with the Renaissance:


1453: Fall of Constantinople

1455: The War of the Roses breaks out in England

1485: War concludes as the Tudors take over, under King Henry VII

1492. The first of Columbus' voyages.

1494: Savonarola takes over in Florence

1498: Savonarola executed. 

1504. Michelangelo completes work on his DAVID.

1510. Hieronymous Bosch paints THE GARDEN OF EARTHLY DELIGHTS

1513. Niccolo Machiavelli puts out THE PRINCE, a study of the means that one must use to control a city-state, expressing a devout hope for the unity of Italy against its foreign oppressors.

1530. The earliest known pictures of instruments recognizable as violins date to this time, in northern Italy.  

1598. The earliest known work that could be modern standards be considered an opera is performed in this year, DAFNE, in Florence. 

1605. The publication of Cervantes' masterpiece, Don Quixote. 

Labels:

Comments

  1. Paul D. Van PeltJuly 29, 2022 at 4:54 AM

    Fascinating! Thanks for the sketch. Did not realize the period predated Enlightenment by so much. Not much of a history scholar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ChristopherJuly 29, 2022 at 7:18 AM

      You're welcome. As you may have noticed, the first half of that (covering the second half of the 15th century) is all about the Big Picture stuff -- voyages, battles, an execution. The second half (ranging over the whole of the 16th century) is about the Art that we associate with the word Renaissance. I think of this as Cause and Effect. The outburst of creativity involving Bosch, Michelangelo, etc., was made possible by the world shaking events before. I may have another post soon being more explicit about the connections.

      Delete
    2. ChristopherJuly 29, 2022 at 7:18 AM

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more