Skip to main content

The Oxford Shooter Back in the Headlines

 


It was big news back in November and December of last year. But there have been so many mass shootings since then, that this one has rather faded into the background outside of Michigan. 

So, by way of reminder: on November 30, a 16 year old boy named Ethan Crumbley shot eleven people, killing four of them, within the halls of Oxford High School, in Oxford, Michigan.

More from here:

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/3568687-oxford-shooter-parents-seek-to-have-cases-against-them-thrown-out

The parents have been arrested on what seem to me quite dubious grounds. Obviously, if the parents had given him a gun and told him "it would be really great if you walked into school and started shooting" there would be criminal liability. But I will allow you to read the facts and determine how far from that is this situation. 

Incidentally, this season's contestants on "America's Got Talent" include one talented vocalist who was in Oxford High on that fateful day and lost friends. If only for that reason, we'll be hearing a lot more about this.  


Comments

  1. Paul D. Van PeltJuly 28, 2022 at 9:54 AM

    I freely admit that, at this writing (my comment here), I do not have the facts. That said, I donn my sociologist hat. When these crimes are committed, there must be blame laid. On someone. In this case, presumably because of the killer's age and his parent's agency, the parents were deemed culpable. The family is but one tiny segment of the Big Picture. Our culture glorifies violence---it is entertainment. We relish all sorts of extremism, from sports through politics and beyond. Ethics is given a figurative nod and wink. Get by with anything you can, lie when you are caught. Who is to blame now? Connect the dots.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
24 comments
Read more

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
10 comments
Read more

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...
8 comments
Read more