Skip to main content

A Bit of Holocaust Historiography

Ghetto Vilinus.gif

I am at work on an essay in historiography; specifically, the history of the development of historians' (and the publics) views of the Holocaust. My goal is a publishable essay on the subject, although who would publish such a thing from me I have no idea.

Anyway, in the course of the research I have learned a bit about Gerald Reitlinger, who was known as an art historian in the '30s and during the war, but who in In regard to the Holocaust, came out unexpectedly with THE FINAL SOLUTION (1952).

One of Reitlinger’s many contributions here was to bring the matter of the Warsaw ghetto uprising squarely into the frame. This rather markedly runs against the denial of individual agency in many accounts of the Holocaust. The historians tend to give us banal commandants and passive Jewish victims, and open rebellion by the not-so-passive victims, where it occurs, is "not my department," like where the rockets come down.

Jews like Merek Edelman chose not to be passive victims but instead (in Edelman’s words,”to pick the time of our deaths.”  Precisely for this reason, it is important to bring them into the story today, whatever one’s Big Picture of the Holocaust. And to Reitlinger one owes some credit for that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...