Brexit, Coronavirus, and a Teleprompter II

As I was saying ... the silliness of the Oval Office speech became obvious in stages. He didn't mean "cargo." He didn't mean to suggest that Americans abroad wouldn't be able to fly home. He didn't even mean to exclude the United Kingdom. The UK and the Republic of Ireland were both explicitly included within a couple of days.

So supporting Brexit had never had anything to do with it. Or not much.

It was a disaster of a speech, reminding me of an old comedy bit about a cheese shop.

"Not much of a cheese shop, is it?"

"It's the finest in the district, sir."

"Explain the logic behind that conclusion."

"It's so clean."

"It's certainly uncontaminated by cheese."

Anyway: through much of the speech Trump appeared to be having trouble reading the words on the teleprompter. Yet he persisted, which resulted in some odd inflections.

My guess is that some of the simple looniness of the speech came at patches where Trump could not help but riff. He was almost certainly riffing, going off text, when he said, "Anything coming from Europe to the United States is what we are discussing."

That is not a line a professional "ghost" would have written even if it were actually the policy the POTUS was trying to announce.

Ah, for the professional speechwriters. Among all the sorts of expertise to which our leaders used to attend, all now discarded ... I miss that one the most.

Peace out.

Comments

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere. At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...

Jamesian Philosophy Refreshed

Search This Blog