Skip to main content

The saga of the re-birth of WeWork


 


I wrote a post here in March about the bankrupty proceedings in regard to WeWork, a company that had attempted to arbitrage the commercial lease market. It leased temporary office space, used for example by companies in the midst of a transition, whose new digs aren't quite ready yet.  It leased such space long term from the owners of suitable properties, and subleased them short term, counting on the fact that you can get more money on a per-day basis leasing short term.

As I indicated when I wrote it up in late March, WeWork seemed o a knife's edge. Either it would end up liquidating OR it would end up being re-organized on a solvent basis. The issue would turn on how effectively it could stiff its own leasors, the building owners, in the bankruptcy process.

The situation is an unusual one because, although most businesses do pay rent to someone, including most businesses that are cash strapped enough to seek bankruptcy court protection, in the usual case this is a humdrum incidental "overhead" expense.  In this case the rent WeWork paid was more integral to its business plan -- that rent was the cost of precisely the service it was going to turn around and sell.  Legal precedents and rules designed for the former situation made an odd fit or no fit at all for the latter. 

I can now report that WeWork has been sufficiently successful in stiffing its own landlords so that it will not be liquidated. The Honorable John Sherwood has approved the restructuring plan and the company is said to be ready to emerge from bankruptcy court protection, although I have not yet seen an exact date. Any day now, it appears.    

   WeWork cleared to exit bankruptcy and slash $4 billion in debt | Reuters

I am ambivalent about this result. But I am very happy about one thing: the new WeWork has no connection with the company founder, Adam Neumann -- a litigious fellow quick on the draw with a defamation lawsuit threat.  (If he sends me one I will gladly share the news here.)  

AN has no talent other than that of selling himself as a genius to the suckers. In the whole course of his rise and fall as the great office-sharing guru, he never had any idea what he was doing, and a lot of people and institutions have paid a price for that. He also had so much arrogance that he claimed an intellectual property right to the pronoun "we".   

May he live a long life in thorough and deserved obscurity hereafter.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
8 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
15 comments
Read more