Top Financial Stories 2013

I generally ask myself at this time of year what were the biggest stories of the past twelve months in business/financial news.

Of course, I choose the ones I do largely because they illustrate an important theme, and in the list below I'll spell out and italicize the theme. Yet the theme itself isn't the story.

Further, I cannot help the fact that in the list as below currency issues keep coming up. That is a fact about the year, not I think about my biases.

All that said, here is this year's list.

January 2013: The tablet/smartphone wars. Announcement of the BlackBerry 10 from Canadian concern RiM. Concurrently, RiM changes its name to BlackBerry. This will be their big final bid to remain a player on the level of Apple and the Android group. It will fail.

February 2013: Currency as policy. A G-20 finance ministers' meeting in Moscow, Russia, focuses attention on competitive devaluations. Japan escapes explicit censure at the meeting, though the yen is on all minds. Meanwhile, in a related development, Russia was aggressively buying gold. In August an expert on world currency issues told me that Russia had acquired 1/8th of the gold of the U.S. Russia has 1/8th the economy of the U.S., too, so in terms of the gold-to-GDP ratio they have attained parity.

March 2013: Ever-morphing Eurozone crisis. The first form of the proposal for Cyprus's bank bail-in, with a charge against even insured depositors, sets off latest round of recriminations between southern and northern European countries.

April 2013: Currency alternatives. Sudden bitcoin volatility raises the profile of the algorithmic cybercurrency, which is also splitting hard-money folks by confusing gold bugs. EconomicPolicyJournal.com, the often-excellent policy journal for Austrian types run by Robert Wenzel, has distinguished itself by its anti-bitcoin stance.

May 2013: Currency speculations. Australian dollar falls sharply against the US dollar amidst rumors of George Soros' involvement. In some mind, this rouses memories of how Soros became famous, back in '92.

June 2013: Intellectual property. U.S. Supreme Court limits gene patents. IP hawks and IP doves have a lot to argue about. But one point on which they are agreed of late is that SCOTUS is getting more dovish by the year.

July 2013: Deterioration of US municipalities' finances. Biggest US municipal bankruptcy filing ever. Detroit. 'Nuff said.

August 2013: Electronic infrastructure. Nasdaq software malfunction lasts for three hours!

September 2013: Currency as policy. U.S. Federal Reserve decides not to announce any "tapering" after all, delights Wall Street. [It will finally do a little tapering in the final days of the year.]

October 2013: Policy deadlocks. U.S. govt shutdown and close approach to the debt ceiling harm U.S. credit.

November 2013: Ever-morphing Eurozone crisis. The European Commission warns Spain and Italy that their 2014 budgets are out of line.

December 2013: Eurozone as model. Unrest in Kiev, Ukraine, over the government's refusal to enter into closer trade ties with the EU. The protest gets a major boost on December 11, when police make a show of force but are successfully rebuffed by protestors occupying the city's Independence Square.

If you find the juxtaposition of this story with the two "Eurozone as crisis" stories on this list rather jarring: I can't help that. With all its troubles, the zone has its admirers. "Soft power" and all that. when was the last time a crowd risked police truncheons upside their heads in support of more trade between the country of its participants and the U.S.?

Happy new year.

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere. At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave. First, Plato is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability. I only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Jamesian Philosophy Refreshed

Search This Blog