Skip to main content

The first NFT related insider trading case.


Nate Chastain has been convicted of fraud and money laundering. He profited from his insider knowledge of which NFTs would be featured on OpenSea.

If the second sentence in that short paragraph might as well be in Greek to your ears, allow me to translate. NFTs are "non-fungible tokens." This means that they are a now-faded financial fad, sort of like the tulips of the cryptocurrency realm. That is all you need to know about the term.

OpenSea is an online marketplace for the trading of NFTs created in 2017. Daily trading volume there hit an impressive record of $2.7 billion on May 1, 2022. But that has dropped 99 percent over the following four months, and it has not recovered since. (As I say, this is a faded fad.)

But OpenSea also contains a blog and newsy features. And there the opportunity for chicanery yawned. Chastain was in a position to know which NFTs would be featured on the newsy portions of the site, and to take a position on those NFTs on the trading portions of the site before they were. 

The charge circled about in twitter in September 2021, after that 99% drop in trading volume, that Chastain had in fact engaged in this trading pattern. The remainder of the leadership at OpenSea pressed him for a resignation at that time, and he obliged.   

He was arrested and charged in June 2022. Now, almost a year later, he has been convicted. 

Now, in my earlier incarnation as a self-conscious anarcho-capitalist, I would have launched into a tirade about how Chastain was an entrepreneur who had been victimized by the regulatory/persecutory State. I won't do that now. I will simply offer the following tentative propositions:

1) This doesn't really seem like insider trading, although it is often called that, and the phrase I've used as the headline of this bog entry is commonly employed in this connection;

2) it seems like a pump-and-dump operation, which ought to be regarded by people with normal moral instincts as, at a minimum, dishonorable.

3) Not everything that is dishonorable ought to be prohibited by the force of law, and perhaps an optimal legal system would not punish Chastain's behavior with that force.  


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
17 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more