The year's Pulitzer Prize in Biography

Here is a full list of the 2023 Pulitzer Prize winners.

Here are the 2023 Pulitzer Prize winners : NPR

One of them seems extraordinary enough to be worthy of discussion in the august forum you are now perusing: the Pulitzer for biography. it went this year to G-Man: J. Edgar Hoover and the Making of the American Century.

A distinguished historian, Beverly Gage, wrote the work. Viking published it. I've never read a word of it, and don't plan to. I have to say the prize committee's praise of it sounds quite off-putting to me.

Gage is praised for "a deeply researched and nuanced look at one of the most polarizing figures in U.S. history that depicts the longtime FBI director in all his complexity, with monumental achievements and crippling flaws."

It sounds to me like the prize committee has suffered from a crippling attack of both-sidesism. I would imagine his life did have lots of "complexity," heck in the drag-demonizing 2020s his fashion choices along might be thought complex. But I think the world could have done without his "monumental achievements" quite well.

Perhaps the best thing he did was elevate Mark Felt to a post whence Felt [pictured above] could become "Deep Throat" and effectively bring an end to the Nixon administration. But I suspect that is not what Gage or the prize bestowers mean by the "monumental achievements" stuff.

Indeed, J. Edgar Hoover died in his sleep in May 1972. So we might well say that any credit he may have earned by his elevation of Felt was credit that Hoover earned only over his own dead body.

Comments

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere. At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

A Quote from Parfit

Recently I wrote a little about ethicist Derek Parfit. I've been doing further research on him since, and will now describe his Big Picture as I've come to understand it. Parfit believes that the western world only started taking ethical philosophy seriously (as a domain separate from theology) around the time Nietzsche declared that God was dead. There are only three possibilities, in terms of the God/morality issue: 1) You believe that God exists and that His commands define morality 2) You deny that God exists and, like Nietzsche, infer from this that in the absence of commands there is no right or wrong, or 3) You deny that God exists yet persist in believing and attempting to discern right and wrong. From a certain point of view there could be a fourth category, for people who believe that God exists but that His existence is irrelevant to morality, He doesn't issue commands at all, etc. Still, from DP's perspective that sort of God ...

Jamesian Philosophy Refreshed

Search This Blog