Skip to main content

Mitch McConnell and an analogy

 


The US political class right now reminds me of the end of the Brezhnev period in the USSR. Br himself died. Then Andropov died. Then Chernenko died. The whole cadre had grown old together and they all died together. Only after a lot of death did a new generation -- Yeltsin and, alas, Putin, step forward. And yes, I'm old enough to remember this but I'm still a good deal younger than our analogs to Brezhnev et al.

I'm not a doctor, but I've got a hobby blog, which is qualification enough for what follows -- Mitch McConnell has publicly twice now looked like a man in the midst of a petit mal seizure. This is not just "light headedness" brought on by inadequate hydration. Nor is it at all likely that the two times it ha happened on camera are the only two times it has ever happened.

I wish nothing bad for anyone. I hope Senator McConnell will have a lot of happy years in retirement, surrounded by a loving family and friends. But he ought not to be in a position of responsibility, much less should he be in a position to become Majority Leader of the Senate again should the numbers break that way next fall.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Paul D. Van PeltSeptember 9, 2023 at 7:49 AM

    Sooner than later, public officials need to retire. But is excruciating to leave the stage, and, narcissisticly enough, some of them very likely long to die in office. It casts their legacy in stone. There are concerns, rightfully I think, around an official's fitness to carry out duties.
    Some have expressed concern over a putative front runner for the upcoming presidential contest. Oddly enough, to me anyway, those concerns have not been raised over the possible(?) opponent. Strange game, politics. Anywhere...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more