Skip to main content

Will Yellen Pull a Bernanke?

Image result for janet yellen beard

As you may recall, just a little over two years ago there was a great deal of fuss which seems likely to go down in history as the "Taper Tantrum."

Fed chief Ben Bernanke committed to the idea that the Federal Reserve would taper off its bond buying (that is, its new money creation)in the fall of 2013. In the late spring of that year, some market traders, especially in the bond markets, began to get the idea that "he might really go through with it" and they weren't ready.

The Federal Reserve was itself spooked by the volatility in the bonds markets, and it backed off: Bernanke started in with "I didn't really mean it" statements. And left office the following year.

Now we have a new Fed chief, Janet Yellen, and she too has proposed what she is calling a "normalization" of Fed policy.

This time, too, as the date approaches, some markets get volatile. This time the tantrum is in equities rather than bonds. Why? Mumble mumble pseudo-explanation, mumble mumble Trump, mumble mumble China.

Anyway, we have arrived at put-up-or-shut-up time for Yellen. This coming week, Yellen is either going to normalize, or she is going to back off and continue easy money gamesmanship for ... however long ... perhaps until her successor takes over. 
Labels:

Comments

  1. BloggerFebruary 19, 2017 at 11:28 PM

    I just got a check for over $500.

    Sometimes people don't believe me when I tell them about how much you can earn by taking paid surveys online...

    So I took a video of myself actually getting paid $500 for paid surveys.

    ReplyDelete
  2. BloggerFebruary 20, 2017 at 10:36 PM

    According to information provided by the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators, 1/8 people living in the U.S. are eligible to collect unclaimed money... With claims averaging claims of $1,000!

    Search For Federal & State Available Funds!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
24 comments
Read more

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
10 comments
Read more

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...
8 comments
Read more