Skip to main content

Stream of Association Flows Along

Image result for South Park

For no very compelling reason I'm thinking today of a particular episode of South Park.

The episode I have in mind is one in which a Mormon family moves to the neighborhood. Its son (Gary) starts attending school with Kyle, Stan, etc. The central story line involves Stan and more broadly the Marsh family, the disruption of its habits by the new family in town, and eventually the resumption of normal by the Marsh's as Stan persuades his father that the Mormon story of how their church got its start is nonsensical.

It is possible that the recent unexpected re-appearance of Mitt Romney in our national politics had something to do with turning my thoughts thus. 

But the story gives Gary the last word. Or, almost the last word. Actually, it's Cartman who gets the very last word. After Gary directs an angry monologue at Stan and walks away, Cartman says, "Man, that kid is cool, huh?"

What Gary was saying was that Stan had rejected his friendship because Stan looks down on the historical claims of Mormonism. Gary doesn't take those claims literally either, but what Mormonism means now (to him) is solidarity within the family, assistance to the poor, etc. All good things. And his family lives a good life as a result. So he concludes by cursing out Stan in terms that seem a bit shocking given the character of Gary as established in the earlier action, and he walks off.

Cue Cartman's comment.

It is all rather kind to Mormonism, given how cutting South Park has been in its parodic takes on Scientology, and for that matter the "Super Best Friends," i.e. religious figures (Moses, Buddha, Jesus ...) conceived of in comic book style (and somehow an Aquaman parody character called "Seaman" is a member of the group.)

And here I will let the stream go dry. I don't know what if anything we can conclude about Romney, except that he is less detestable than those like Bannon who now attack him from the right. But that isn't a surprising conclusion and didn't require all this run up.  Ah well.

Comments

  1. No life without problems no problems without solutions....Email dr.gurilarico@gmail. com,... for any any kind of spiritual attack or affliction...He is the best spiritual doctor to work with and can bring back your Ex-Lover in 48 hours for free....He is always ready to help for free.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak