Some possible answers to this occurred to him. One was simply, "Yes." Or, more broadly, "Yes, I hear you." After all, the only actual question he had been asked was whether he had heard the insinuating statement about the handwriting. He had heard it, so strictly a "yes" was a full and fair answer.
But "yes" alone could be interpreted as meaning "yes, I wrote that." Even "yes, I hear you" without more could be interpreted as something like, "yes, I wrote it and I'm glad you appear to have enjoyed the wit of it." That would never do.
He also thought quite briefly of a response that would be suitable for a math class. He could go to the blackboard, grab a piece of chalk, and draw two circles, labeling them A and B. They would NOT intersect. He could then explain to her and to the whole class that set A consisted of everything he had ever done or contributed to in any way whatsoever, and set B consisted of all letter to any teacher with any reference to a bomb in them.
He would then write the symbolism for the intersection of A and B being the null set. But no ... too complicated and confrontational.
So he said this: "Yes, ma'am I heard you. The letter has nothing to do with me; I had nothing to do with it."
She seemed instantly deflated by this, asking only, "Are you sure?"
"Yes."
She had to go on to actually teaching the class material for the day and leaving him be. Whether she continued her Nancy Drew like efforts in some other context, what person or group of persons were actually responsible for that letter ... he would never know of that.
But he would know from that point on that he HAD said the right thing, so it was possible for him to say the right thing in critical moments.
Not very many though. That was just the first out of five.
Comments
Post a Comment