Skip to main content

Why the Brokaw Mill Closed


Image result for paper mill process

 A recent submission to the Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship, and the Law looks at the “Brokaw bill” of 2016 and at the facts said to have motivated it. There are lessons to be drawn from this about how things work in the world, about how the managers of failed enterprises like to think they work, and about who politicians believe.
In March 2016, Sens Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced a bill to “increase transparency and strengthen oversight of activist hedge funds.” Bernie Sanders, then in the midst of a campaign for the Democratic nomination for POTUS, signed on as a co-sponsor.
The proposal was said to have been inspired by the cloture (five years before) of a paper mill in Brokaw, Wisconsin. That paper mill had provided jobs to some of Senator Baldwin’s constituents for years. According to Baldwin and Merkley, the mill closed because a predatory activist hedge fund bought control of the Wausau Paper Company and demanded immediate returns “at the expense of the company’s long-term future.”
But if the 2011 closure inspired the bill, why did it take five years for said bill to be introduced? Was all that time spent sweating the drafting details?
The new revisionist article on the subject, "Failed Anti-Activist Legislation" by Alon Brav et al, answers that question. The bill wasn't introduced in 2011 because the closure had nothing to do with activist hedge funds and it took a few years for the story to percolate that they were at fault. 

The bill closed, NOT under pressure from the hedge fund usually scapegoated here (Starboard Value), but simply in the face of a global decline in the demand for paper in the age of the internet. The falling demand for paper put pressure on profit margins, and the Wausau board late in 2011 approved a plan for closing Brokaw, in the process eliminating 450 jobs, some hourly and some salaried. That was, of course, very bad news for all of the families directly affected. But it isn’t something that can be helped by “oversight” of hedge funds. Indeed, in this specific matter there is, the authors say, “no evidence that hedge fund activism played any determinative role in the closure of the Brokaw mill."
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
24 comments
Read more

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
10 comments
Read more

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...
8 comments
Read more