Skip to main content

Sucking all the oxygen out

 


The photo here is of a recent invention -- a device meant to such carbon out of thin air. But I am more interested in a metaphorical sucking. 

Once upon a time, there might have been debates going on at this stage in the political cycle about policy. 

Has the recent spate of bad weather events at last persuaded doubters that ongoing climate change is a problem requiring human solution? Will the solution come in the form of inventions like the above? Or does it mean something that requires central planning, and sovereign authority? 

Why is the price of house rising at twice the speed of everything else? is there enough parking available in American cities and, if not, why not? do we need more pipelines to carry oil or gas from one point in the US to another?  Or would it be wiser to halt the building of any such lines? 

What (other than the scandalous presence of an inaugural poem in a library) is right or wrong about public schools?What are the risks and the opportunities posed to us or offered for  us by, well, the rest of the planet?

Has the Supreme Court gotten out of control? If so, do the political branches have any weapons handy to bring it back into the borders of its proper function? 

Who are our allies in the rest of the world? Who are our actual or potential enemies? 

Old-fashioned political stuff like that. 

But there is surprisingly very little of this right now.. Even deSantis' thing about cleansing libraries of thought crimes is disappearing from view, because ... Donald Trump and all the investigations and indictments (three as I write -- a fourth may come any day) and pending trials have sucked all of the oxygen out of the room of political news. Policy debates have been sucked away like lint from a carpet as the Roomba passes by.

I kind of miss the old days. 



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
24 comments
Read more

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
10 comments
Read more

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...
8 comments
Read more