Skip to main content

Useless Knowledge

 


Something you have no need to know. How I send attachments to colleagues.

I don't know why it has gotten so complicated but it has.  

Typically I complete a file in a MS Word folder. Then I go to my email page, write a cover letter for the article, and attach the file thereto.  Ah, easy. Right?  

Well, the attaching turns out to be complicated, or at least multi-part. 

To attach (in the manner my co-workers want) I hit the "Insert" tab above the email. 

That causes a new set of tabs to appear, and I hit "Attach File" there.

That produces a drop-down menu, and I hit "OneDrive". 

That creates another box, most of which is a list of recent files completed or added to the folder.  On the left hand side of that box is a column giving me other actions in the event the file I want isn't showing. 

Often, the one I want (when its completion is very recent) is not yet showing.  I don't know whether patiently waiting would work.  I seldom do that well.  So I fiddle a bit with the menu on the left side of the box.  When my fiddling impulse is satisfied, I come back to the Recent files. Amazingly enough, the fiddling seems to work.  The new item will be displayed. 

So ... I can just click it and the file is now attached to the email, right?  Still not quite. I click it and I've now earned myself the appearance of a tab that says "Share Link".  But I'm well advised to notice that on the rightward end of that tab is a shorter tab with a downward arrow on it. And I don't really want to share the LINK. 

I click on that arrow and get one final dropdown menu.  This one gives me a choice between Link or Attach.  I click on Attach and -- at last! -- the document has been attached to the email. 

Such is life in the 21st century.  And no, you'll never get back the time you spent reading this. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
24 comments
Read more

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
10 comments
Read more

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...
8 comments
Read more