Skip to main content

XFinity Booming: NX or 10x?




Ignore that Theranos image. 

Today's subject is a series of television ads promoting Xfinity's wifi capability that uses "boomtown" as a theme.  Wifi is "booming," we are told.  

I am amused by the use of stereotypical examples of other historic booms.

There are gold prospectors (a/k/a the '49ers), -- oil barons (suggestive of the source of Clampett family wealth that fueled its collective relocation to LA) and "tech founders" (a contemporary plague, though these boomtown tech founders have a dotcom/ '90s look).

The company offering us these vignettes, XFinity, is suggesting that the new gold is wifi, and that they have staked their claim.

AdWeek did a sympathetic writeup of the "Boomtown" ads. 

As to the "tech founders" portrayed in the ad, there is a bit of dialog that is deliberately obscure.  Two stereotypical Silicon Valley types are in the same room, a man and a woman.  He asks her a question and she answers with what sounds like "NX double unicorn IPO", although her phrase might also be taken as "ten x double unicorn" as in "ten times...." 

I have to prefer NX. After all, why say "Ten x double" rather than just saying "twenty x"? Anyway: in techie jargon NX means "no execution."  It refers to a type of data (or a "bit") that helps protect devices from software viruses. Presumably the two "tech founders" would know the term.

A bit more vocabulary (see what I did there?) ... an IPO is an initial public offering, when a previously private company gets a listing on an exchange, which during boom times on the stock market often produces a bonanza for the founders/pre-IPO owners, who are selling into the excited market. A "unicorn" is a private firm with a valuation at or exceeding $1 billion.  So the two characters are celebrating their interest in a $2 billion entity that sells security from malicious software.

I'm not going anywhere with this, but it took me some time and mental effort to puzzle out what she was saying so I thought I'd share it....  




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
22 comments
Read more

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
10 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable a...
Post a Comment
Read more