Skip to main content

Eric Weinstein


 In a blog post this summer I discussed Eric Weinstein, a VC manager trained as a mathematician.

I said, quite incidentally, that Weinstein received a Ph.D. in mathematics from Harvard with a thesis on the extension of self-dual Yang-Mills equations. I also admitted that I don't know what that means.

So, dear reader, let us struggle a bit with what that means.

Back in 1954 Chen Ning Yang and Robert Mills developed ideas loosely called "gauge symmetry" in order to describe the strong nuclear force. The "strong" nuclear force is the one that has to counter-act electromagnetism at the subatomic level.  That is: two protons stick together in a nucleus even though both are positively charged so, given our understanding of EM, they "ought" to be flying apart.  

Yang got his Ph.D. in physics at the University of Chicago in 1948 and thereafter was briefly an assistant to Enrico Fermi.

His work with Mills in essence outlined the mathematics of a scenario in which the carrier particles of a force can themselves radiate further carrier particles.     

So Weinstein's work in some sense builds upon the Yang-Mills equations developed in that context. 

The Yang-Mills equations define fields with curvature. The term "self-dual" describes a feature of that curvature.  Beyond that, I'd just be typing in lieu of understanding.  

Labels:

Comments

  1. Clover LilacOctober 2, 2025 at 8:34 AM

    Really helpful share! Subscriptions like Kia Connect add so much convenience, and finding a promo code for Kia Connect makes it even better. Always good to save while staying connected on the road.

    Promo Code For Kia Connect

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
24 comments
Read more

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
10 comments
Read more

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...
8 comments
Read more