Skip to main content

DEMIAN by Hermann Hesse




I described this book in this blog less than one year ago, as one of the landmark works of a neglected golden age of intellectual activity in the western world, the period from 1880 to and including 1920.

Hermann Hesse is best known in the Anglophone world anyway for a very different work, SIDDHARTHA. But that wasn't published until 1922, a little bit outside of the somewhat arbitrary limit of the golden age in question.  And its force may be lessened by its universality.

DEMIAN was published in 1919. Its subtitle is THE STORY OF EMIL SINCLAIR'S YOUTH and ES has the narrative voice. I am in possession both of an English and (through an accident I will not discuss) a Spanish language translation of the original German text. 

Hesse, who was born in 1877, did not pass away until 1962.  He wrote a forward to this book, again getting into character as Emil Sinclair, quite late in life, in 1960. 

The third paragraph of that forward begins this way:

"Authors, in writing novels, usually act as if they were God, and could by a broadness of perception, comprehend and present any human story as if God were telling it to Himself without veiling anything, and with all the essential details. This I cannot do...."

I find that a bit odd, because (a) he is being explicit about the issue of the narrative point of view, but (b) he is suggesting that anything other than an omniscient narrator represents a break from tradition, from the way such things are "usually" done. That is plainly false, and must have been known to be false to anyone with the literary sophistication of Hesse.  Limited narrative PoVs are quite common, whether first person (as here) or third person in form. Heck, if anything is the "usual" route it is probably limited third-person PoV, not the God's view postulated as the usual way here. 

But, no biggie. Presumably Emil Sinclair is not clear on what is "usual".    

Comments

  1. I was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease four years ago and spent over two years on Levodopa and other medications, but my symptoms continued to worsen. Last year, I decided to try a herbal treatment from NaturePath Herbal Clinic. Within a few months, my tremors reduced, my movement improved, and my balance became steadier. I regained energy and confidence and now feel better than I have in years. I truly recommend exploring their natural approach: www.naturepathherbalclinic.com
    info@naturepathherbalclinic.com

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

A Quote from Parfit

Recently  I wrote a little about ethicist Derek Parfit. I've been doing further research on him since, and will now describe his Big Picture as I've come to understand it. Parfit believes that the western world only started taking ethical philosophy seriously (as a domain separate from theology) around the time Nietzsche declared that God was dead. There are only three possibilities, in terms of the God/morality issue: 1) You believe that God exists and that His commands define morality 2) You deny that God exists and, like Nietzsche, infer from this that in the absence of commands there is no right or wrong, or 3) You deny that God exists yet persist in believing and attempting to discern right and wrong. From a certain point of view there could be a fourth category, for people who believe that God exists but that His existence is irrelevant to morality, He doesn't issue commands at all, etc.  Still, from DP's perspective that sort of God ...