Skip to main content

Sometimes Reality Doesn't Cooperate with Our Need for a Theme

 




Reading through the morning-after coverage of the big primary night from two weeks ago (North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Idaho, Oregon) I was looking for some guidance on where we are headed in this mid-term year, and I was struck by the elusiveness of social reality.

Our own inner reality, our human nature, dictates that we look for a central theme in the outer reality, specifically in a range of elections across the country. We want a single frame for the night. Lots of important stuff was going on, it seemed all to have SOMETHING to tell us about where all the midterm election jockeying stands, but it refused to gel. 

Reporters and pundits seemed to have wanted to write either "Trump still has a firm grip on the GOP" or maybe "Trump no longer has a firm grip on the GOP." Instead, they had to acknowledge that he didn't get his way in Idaho or a southwestern corner of North Carolina, but that he had gotten his way in a statewide party primary in NC and in another congressional district there. He also MIGHT have gotten his way in Pennsylvania too, although that was still uncertain at the time of the Wednesday morning stories, and is probably STILL uncertain even as you read this. 

With regard to the one most high-profile race, one that reminded people of Oprah no less, the facts refused to gel. There were three main characters at the end: one Trump had specifically warned against, apparently because she is too pure a Trumpet to win over swing votes, and another Trump had specifically endorsed, apparently because he is a television-born celebrity too. If Mehmet Oz had only won easily, and the warned-against candidate had fallen away to a clear distant third, the "Trump still has it!" headlines would have written themselves, notwithstanding Cawthorn. 

And the purist Trumpet did fall into a median-distance third, cooperating with this frame. But the 'other guy' in this troika, David McCormick, gummed up the works. 

Reality, eh? what a bummer. 

Labels:

Comments

  1. Paul D. Van PeltJune 1, 2022 at 7:46 AM

    Reality, in such circumstances, is overridden by context. The national dialog changed dramatically with the advent of the Trump years. For some, lying became part of a newer skill set. Circumstances shift as contingencies surface. Many establishmentarians vastly underestimated the duration of the phenomenon. Fewer now, continue to do so. In one humble opinion, postmodernism set the stage for the demise of democracy. Contextual reality was already raising its head...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
24 comments
Read more

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
10 comments
Read more

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...
8 comments
Read more