Skip to main content

Private hospitals in Australia


News from Down Under.  (It has nothing to do with kangaroos but I like the photo.) 

Healthscope, Australia's second-largest private hospital operator, entered receivership in late May due to severe financial stresses. It will continue to operate but with the expectation of a restructuring. 

Australia has a dual healthcare system, public and private, both as to payments and as to the institutions of care.  A public system, 'Medicare,' covers everyone for doctor visits, hospital stays and some medical tests,  It also pays a portion of many prescription medications.

There is much that Medicare doesn't cover, including dental physiotherapy and ambulance services.  There are also distinct public and private hospitals.   

Some Australians take the public.private balance to be itself a value worth preserving.  The president of the Australian Medical Association told a reporter recently that the balance between the two is "what makes our healthcare system unique and is what leads to some of the world-leading outcomes we see in Australia."

But the failure of Health scope may be a milestone. It has strengthened the force in the country that contend that the dual system should move closer to a fully public system, that the private component is chiefly a source of trouble. 

I'm offering no opinions: I do think this development is worthy of note. 

Labels:

Comments

  1. Paul D. Van PeltJune 25, 2025 at 1:40 PM

    Let us infer that Australia is moving towards assisted suicide? As opposed to increased costs for long-term care for terminally ill persons? Very pragmatic. Does Australia need more healthy, creative younger people? Does this, if right, amount to my notion of contextual reality? sa da te...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
24 comments
Read more

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
10 comments
Read more

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...
8 comments
Read more