Captain Kirk and the Cretan paradox

For fans of the original Star Trek. Let us remember for a fleeting moment an episode in which Captain Kirk, with some help, defeats a robot that had been holding him prisoner. In part at least this victory is won by telling the robot "I am a liar." The paradox is too much, the robot blows its fuses, and Kirk gets back to his ship.

This is of course a tight version of the old Cretan paradox. The original version was just "All Cretans are liars" spoken by a Cretan. Not much of a paradox at all, actually. And St. Paul makes a brief reference to it without mentioning its paradoxical nature.

There are lots and lots of Cretans. For any one Cretan to say "we're such a lying bunch" is not paradoxical. It may seem like to speaker is giving himself too much credit as a supposed exception to that generalization: still, no paradox. A Cretan might even say "all Cretans are liars" and be considered to have spoken hyperbolically. Perhaps a communicative fault but not a logical one.

Let's make it tighter though. Captain Kirk says to the robot "I always lie." He is not lumping himself in as a member of a group of liars -- he is himself the only group member. Still, this may not impress everyone as paradoxical. It could more easily be another example of hyperbole, "I usually lie -- this statement is a rare exception." A better-built robot might have processed it that way.

By degrees we come to the full-force, tight-as-hell paradox. "This is a lie."

And THAT is still much debated. Here is an example of contemporary wrestling with it:

Live long and prosper.

Comments

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere. At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave. First, Plato is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability. I only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable a...

Jamesian Philosophy Refreshed

Search This Blog