Skip to main content

Viktor Orban and the near future of Hungary

 


Viktor Orban of Hungary has become paradigmatic of a sort of soft dictatorship, maintaining at least some of the mechanisms of an open society, a republic, with one hand but subverting those mechanisms in favor of an illiberal authoritarianism on the other. 

When did Orban and his regime earn this paradigmatic status?  The key years were 2011-2012. That is when his regime drafted a new constitution behind closed doors, rushed it through parliament in nine days and passed it on a party line. This tailor-made constitution saw a reduction in the number of seats in parliament from 386 to 199.

Orban maintains tight control over this shrunken body. A few years later (2020) he had that parliament vote for a bill that created a state of emergency without a time limit, essentially giving Orban the power to rule without them. 

Now, though, there are signs of life in resistance, forming around the figure of a former disciple of Orban, now on the outs largely over the issue of Russian influence: Peter Magyar, shown above.  Orban has had to keep his soft dictatorship soft because the country has strong economic incentives for remaining within the EU, and the EU insists on a minimal acceptance of the "rule of law" amongst members.

This means, at a minimum, that there is some limit to the blatancy with which elections can be rigged. 

Parliamentary elections scheduled for April 2026 in Hungary may reflect the long build-up of resentments, and the rise of Magyar, with the possibility of a body that would actually push-back. If that is how April goes, we in the US may draw some hope heading toward the following autumn.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
24 comments
Read more

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
10 comments
Read more

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...
8 comments
Read more